Body Mass Index — an example of bogus and political medical belief…

Recently, there have seen several interesting articles finding that life expectancy increases  for a while as you BMI increase beyond the ideal, and then decrease.  This is very old news for me, as a statistician, I have seen this in actuary tables since the 1980’s  (tables used to determine insurance premiums — an industry where statistics trumps beliefs, usually).

Body mass index is defined as the individual’s body mass divided by the square of his or her height. As a physicist, I can’t help but notice that we happen to live in at least a three dimensional world (adding time, makes it four dimensional). Additionally, politics have had it impact by changing the levels of overweight based on belief or corporate agenda (i.e. if more people are overweight or obese, then there is more opportunity to prescribe or sell items to fix what may be a non-existent issue). For more back ground, see this Wikipedia article:

The problem of the non-actuary approach is that while you may find increased risk of heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke, diabetes; decreased risks of other diseases are not considered. In other words — a blinkered view.

If we assume that BMI 25.is ideal for a 1.6 meter individual, we find a weight of 72 kg. If we instead use BMI-3 or Mass/ (height x height x height), the equivalent number would be 14.655. For a 1.5 m person, the same BMI-3 suggests a weight of 49kg. For a 2 m person, BMI-3 suggests 136 kg.

BMI 25

Height BMI = 25 BMI-3 = 14.655
1.5 m  57 kg  49 kg
1.7 m  72 kg  72 kg
2.0 m  111 kg  136 kg

In other words, shorter people can carry 16% more weight, and tall people must be 20% leaner. So on BMI, I would come in as 30, but with BMI-3, it’s 15.8. Or  30/25 = 20% above with BMI versus 8% above with BMI-3.

The term “evidence based science” is often tossed around, the unfortunate termed that is missing is “biased”, i.e. “biased evidence based science”. The majority of studies are not reviewed by hard-core independent statisticians.

In terms of studies for CFS and chronic lyme, studies that found no benefit from antibiotics often suffer from this type of bias. Antibiotics are part of a complex regime when remission has been reported — taking them in isolation does not “prove” they do not work — it shows only that they do not work when applied in a naive manner.

Flu may actually cause CFS in some….

It is almost a year since I had flu that cascaded into a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome relapsed. As the symptoms appeared, I proceeded with the full range of items (as I then understood the syndrome) with success in delaying having to stop working for 3 months. When I stopped heavy dosages of anticoagulants due to excessive bruising, my cognitive ability collapsed very quickly.

Since then, I am nearing a remission of all symptoms except the neurological ones, which are waning (but still there according to the Neurologist). Since CFS can appear in SPECT scan as brain trauma, recovering from brain trauma takes time.

The vast majority of improvement have come from addressing gut bacteria issues aggressively and with a host of a-typical items such as:

  • Mutaflor (E.Coli Nissle 1917)
  • Lactobacillus Reuteri
  • Some other very unusual probiotics that most people do not know exists
  • Tulsi, Haritaki, Neem
  • Goat Cheese, 85% Chocolate, 100% Rye Bread (made in Germany)

There have been massive headaches from some of the above, but I accept Herx as a harsh, but positive sign.

The Flu Connection

I decided to see what we know about Flu and gut bacteria on PubMed.

So studies seems to suggest that the gut bacteria are a significant factor for flu. Probiotics may protect someone from getting the flu, and the gut is a “petri dish” for the influenza virus to grow in.

The many reports of getting CFS after a “flu like disease”, may need to be updated to, “after the flu”.

Blaisi Salts, Electrolyte Salts and unhealthy “Healthy Recommendations”

Alfred Blasi Protocol

A few years ago, this protocol was very popular and then faded from sight. This approach used Recuperat-ion, mineral salts containing the minerals that were found to be low in CFS and Fibromyalgia. It had some success in improving symptoms (as would be expected because of the high magnesium content).  The composition of these salts is:

Contents of Recuperat-ion Electrolyte Salt

Ion per 100g per sachet
Calcium 428 mg 15 mg
Magnesium 428 mg 15 mg
Potassium 5.7 g 200 mg
Sodium 21 g 740 mg

All electrolyte salts are not the same. For example, ElectroMix (produced by Alacer Corp) was used by many who could not afford Recuperation. Its contents are shown below.

Contents of ElectroMix Electrolyte Salt

Ion per sachet
Calcium 100 mg
Chromium 20 mcg
Magnesium 120 mg
Manganese 2 mg
Potassium 408 mg

One significant difference is the amount of Sodium which is the main ingredient of one and missing from the other. This difference impacts blood pH and orthostatic intolerance.

A third commercial electrolyte salt, SaltStick details is shown below.

Contents of SaltStick Electrolyte Salt

Ion per capsule
Calcium 22 mg
Chromium 20 mcg
Magnesium 11 mg
Potassium 63 mg
Sodium 215 mg

Another related approach was “Salt and Vitamin C”. Which also cause improvement for some,

The interesting thing is that studies have found that CFS tend to eat “healthy low-salt diets”, despite studies finding that increased salt improves some CFS symptoms (unless other conditions are an issue).

IMHO: two normally healthy recommendations:

  • Low Salt Diets
  • Taking Lacterbacillus Adolphius probiotics

Are NOT healthy recommendations for CFS patients…

 

Blaisi Salts, Electrolyte Salts and unhealthy "Healthy Recommendations"

Alfred Blasi Protocol

A few years ago, this protocol was very popular and then faded from sight. This approach used Recuperat-ion, mineral salts containing the minerals that were found to be low in CFS and Fibromyalgia. It had some success in improving symptoms (as would be expected because of the high magnesium content).  The composition of these salts is:

Contents of Recuperat-ion Electrolyte Salt

Ion per 100g per sachet
Calcium 428 mg 15 mg
Magnesium 428 mg 15 mg
Potassium 5.7 g 200 mg
Sodium 21 g 740 mg

All electrolyte salts are not the same. For example, ElectroMix (produced by Alacer Corp) was used by many who could not afford Recuperation. Its contents are shown below.

Contents of ElectroMix Electrolyte Salt

Ion per sachet
Calcium 100 mg
Chromium 20 mcg
Magnesium 120 mg
Manganese 2 mg
Potassium 408 mg

One significant difference is the amount of Sodium which is the main ingredient of one and missing from the other. This difference impacts blood pH and orthostatic intolerance.

A third commercial electrolyte salt, SaltStick details is shown below.

Contents of SaltStick Electrolyte Salt

Ion per capsule
Calcium 22 mg
Chromium 20 mcg
Magnesium 11 mg
Potassium 63 mg
Sodium 215 mg

Another related approach was “Salt and Vitamin C”. Which also cause improvement for some,

The interesting thing is that studies have found that CFS tend to eat “healthy low-salt diets”, despite studies finding that increased salt improves some CFS symptoms (unless other conditions are an issue).

IMHO: two normally healthy recommendations:

  • Low Salt Diets
  • Taking Lacterbacillus Adolphius probiotics

Are NOT healthy recommendations for CFS patients…

 

A completely different probiotic blend — and I mean different!

A reader of this blog shipped me a link to a very interesting probiotic. Finding ‘unusual’ probiotics is a good quest because at many conferences, CFS MD’s have stated that they have seen no evidence of (typical) probiotics helping the patient. My own impression is that  since most contain L.Acidophilus (which inhibits E.Coli), I am almost surprised that they did not say, “makes CFS a little worst”.

This probiotic is described at this UK site as well as at Amazon.com (but not Amazon.co.uk). It contains none of the usual bacterias!

  • Anthrobacter agilis,
  • Anthrobacter citreus,
  • Anthrobacter globiformis,
  • Anthrobacter luteus,
  • Anthrobacter simplex,
  • Acinetobacter calcoaceticus,
  • Azotobacter chroococcum,
  • Azotobacter paspali,
  • Azospirillum brasiliense,
  • Azospirillum lipoferum,
  • Bacillus brevis,
  • Bacillus marcerans,
  • Bacillus pumilis,
  • Bacillus polymyxa,
  • Bacillus subtilis,
  • Bacteroides lipolyticum,
  • Bacteriodes succinogenes,
  • Brevibacterium lipolyticum,
  • Brevibacterium stationis,
  • Kurtha zopfil,
  • Myrothecium verrucaria,
  • Pseudomonas calcis,
  • Pseudomonas dentrificans,
  • Pseudomonas flourescens,
  • Pseudomonas glathei,
  • Phanerochaete chrysosporium,
  • Streptomyces fradiae,
  • Streptomyces celluslosae,
  • Streptomyces griseoflavus

In terms of PubMed Studies, there are two, both done by Battelle Seattle Research Center, Washington, USA.

Both studies dealt with Irritable Bowel Syndrome which is often co-morbid with CFS. From these studies:

  •  At >or=52-week follow-up, the rate of remissions was 81.5% to 100% (P < 0.003).
  • This study identified 3 subsyndromic factors of IBS: general ill feelings/nausea, indigestion/flatulence, and colitis. In this methodologically oriented double-blind study in patients with IBS, combined probiotic-prebiotic treatment with Prescript-Assist was associated with significant reductions in these factors.

There have been no studies with CFS or FM. Studies with Lactic acid bacteria and IBS found “The probiotic combination was not significantly superior to the placebo in relieving symptoms of IBS.”.

Bottom line: A definite thumbs up on trying this for at least 4 weeks.