Some more ubiome results ..

A few more readers sent in result.

  • “P” Bottom 4% for biodiversity (lowest that I have seen)
  • “Q” 75% for biodiversity
  • “R” 71% for biodiversity
  • “S” 78% for biodiversity

Instead of verbal comparison, see the population charts below for a visual of the various bacteria groups!! Oh boy are there huge shifts!!!!

Example Run of Ubiome Reports

After you log in, you have a menu appear.


Clicking on Compare take you a display like below that shows the relative amount at different levels.


Or you can view it visually by volume (Patient “P”)



Patient “D”

This is from earlier summary,   D had IBS only and no CFS


Patient F, CFS only after 20 years


Patient G


Patient J



A year earlier


Two years earlier


Patient K


Patient Q


Patient R


Patient S


Bottom Line

Above you see many different patterns — the shifts are different (and likely match the person symptoms often). “P” is very severe, close to patient J, 2 years earlier (whose profile evolved closer to healthy).

The chart below is from the nature journal[2015]. we have Bacteriodes being the dominate one, nothing comes close!

  • We have some patients with greater Faecalibacterium , Kluyvera in 3 of these parents — definitely a massive overgrowth of these groups!
  • Faecalibacterium and/or Eubacterium are usually #2…  We have three with Blautia being #2. According to the charts, we should not expect more than 1% Blautia


  • -1 ==> 10% of population
  • -2 ==> 1% of the population
  • -3 ==> 0.1 % of the population

What to do?

Most of these bacteria are not available as probiotics. Blautia overgrowth is something that I will research more (because of 3 people having such a high amount). Apart from that, keep to the suggestions of the model. Also, you can see why it is a model — the shifts are not all the same, but the shifts are very noticeable shifts… with the wrong group moving into dominance.